Post # 2409 Image
Post # 2409

A reason why self-proclaimed democracies are not exactly democraciesOur society is obsessed with so-called fake news, but this maniacal belief looks like a trick to cover up the real problems: the media love for politically correct issues (which are often a bunch of fairy tales), the denial of unpleasant facts and (frequently!) the refusal to speak whenever what is deemed to be fake turns out to be true.









A REASON WHY SELF-PROCLAIMED DEMOCRACIES ARE NOT EXACTLY DEMOCRACIES [Post # P2409]

September 8, 2024 Image

Fake news: the worst of the worst, the most horrible, the most detestable, the most alarming, the most treacherous weapon in the hands of professional liars and conspiracy theorists... or, maybe, conspiracy terrorists!
This is what we hear every day from the right thinking people and politically correct firebrands.

Well, as already observed in this blog in the past, the fake news concept, in the writer's opinion, is more likely an excuse to silence different opinions, while the really horrible, detestable, alarming, treacherous weapons that are regularly used by unscrupulous demagogues and biased media are the despicable practice of ignoring actual facts (if they contradict the common narrative) AND the disgusting habit of repeating the same story many times over (for days, weeks, months) whenever it fits the political bias of the mainstream mediaeven in the case of stories, which are based on unverified and misleading claims!
This successful practice is in full accordance with an old saying, which is often attributed to Joseph Goebbels. It goes something like this: If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it!!!

In order to clarify this claim, a good starting point is the first full press conference of the then almost newly elected President of the United States on March 25, 2021.

Just imagine what would have happened if Donald Trump, on March 25, 2017 had mumbled that you hold near and dear to you that you... uh um like to be able. Anyway... I... we're ready to get a lot done!
And that was just the beginning!
The mainstream media didn't make any fuss when the (apparently) Commander-in-chief spoke about
➤ a meeting with "Mitterand from Germany I mean France" in 2021 (while François Mitterrand had died in 1996)
➤ a nice talk with Kohl about the Capitol Hill riots in 2021 (while Helmut Kohl had died in 2017)
➤ the Russian President Vladimir Putin, who was "losing the war in Iraq"
➤ India and Japan, which are "xenophobic", because "They don’t want immigrants"
➤ his uncle, whose remains were never recovered, "because there used to be a lot of cannibals" in Papua New Guinea
...not to talk about incoherent comments and awkward relations with teleprompters!

Everything was downplayed: just a few words in minor articles, without any emphasis.
Similarly, the (actually true) story about a laptop belonging to the son of the above Commander-in-chief was quickly dismissed as "Russian propaganda" and the mainstream media did not care at all about the Big Boy's mishandling of classified information, while nearly everyone on Earth was informed and informed again and INFORMED OVER AND OVER AGAIN of the criminal charges accusing Donald Trump of illegally handling top secret documents at Mar-a-Lago.
What about the outcome?
As expected, no charges were brought against "a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory", while the classified documents case against Donald Trump was recently dismisses since "the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith violated the Constitution"... BUT the Justice Department has authorized the special counsel to appeal the decision, setting the ground for further developments and new opportunities for liberal networks!

As for the laptop story, the implications appear to be much more serious: it was part of a cover-up to influence the elections in 2020.
Everything was scientifically orchestrated by progressive news outlets, with the help of would-be champions of democracy, who were pretending to protect ingenuous Americans from alleged "Russian misinformation", while they were actually stabbing democracy in the back and succeeded in manipulating the US election and did not allow the US to have free and fair elections.
As a matter of fact, this is what really happened, since it eventually turned out that the laptop story was not a fantasy tale and, in consequence, the words of former CIA Director and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta (about a letter signed by 51 intelligence officials in OCTOBER 2020) sound like an accusation against the above mentioned champions of democracy, who had falsely claimed that the truth was misleading Russian propaganda:
"I signed that letter for one reason, which was to make the American people aware that the Russians deliberately were engaged in a disinformation campaign in the United States and trying to impact on our election and trying to impact on our ability to have free and fair elections".
To put it straight (in more diplomatic terms), the truth of the matter was outlined in a letter (April 2023) by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner, R-Ohio, when they made reference to a testimony by Michael Morell, a former CIA Deputy Director:
"Based on Morell's testimony, it is apparent that the Biden campaign played an active role in the origins of the public statement, which had the effect of helping to suppress the Hunter Biden story and preventing American citizens from making a fully informed decision during the 2020 presidential election."

Sometimes, however, even the brashest hacks run into a roadblock.
On June 27, 2024, after forty months during which the Commander-in-chief (😂) had been praised as a brilliant statesman with full command of the language and the facts (EVEN IF interviews and press conferences never seemed to be his favorite materials to work with) a television broadcast came like a lightning bolt out of the blue.
Too many people had been watching the horror unfolding in Atlanta!!!
The mainstream media and their comrades knew that the truth couldn't be hidden any longer!😨😨😨
At that point, it was not so easy to concoct a credible story, which could be universally accepted by the liberal world and naive voters.

Depending on the circumstances, on the personal feelings, on the interlocutor and, maybe, on the day of the week, progressive pundits and bigwigs tried to do their best in a random way. Some words of a representative from California (the cradle of liberal thought and liberal imagination), which were pronounced in different circumstances and on different days, are a mirror of the ensuing chaos:
➤ "I don't know who's doing that. I'm not doing it, and I don't know anyone who is doing it. I mean maybe some people outside. I don't know." (June 28, 2024, while talking about Democrats who had allegedly called for the Commander-in-chief to step down)
➤ "I think it's a legitimate question to say, is this an episode, or is this a condition? And so when people ask that question, it's completely legitimate" (July 2, 2024)
➤ "It's up to the president to decide if he is going to run. We're all encouraging him to make that decision because time is running short." (JULY 10, 2024)
Please note that the so-called Commander-in-chief had already clearly stated (JULY 8, 2024) that he was perfectly fit and "firmly committed" to staying in the race. Therefore, it is "legitimate" to wonder why some weird people were still engaged in "encouraging him to make that decision"!!!

Going deeper into the subject, do the words cheap fakes ring any bells?
Before the Atlanta meltdown the mainstream media did not hesitate to pretend that their Commander-in-chief was far from being "confused"far from being a "MEANDER IN CHIEF"!!!!!
NO FACT-CHECKING, no doubts, no hesitation in spreading the cheap fakes lie before June 27!!!

Obviously, there are no apologies, and there will never be any apologies, for the blatant cover-up of the Commander-in-chief's health conditions that had been going on for over three years!
All we could hope for was the great news that "his inner circle worked to conceal his decline"of course, without suggesting that a lot of Goebbels-like reporters had certainly seen and heard their Commander-in-chief speaking in a funny language and had definitely "worked to conceal his decline", as well as they are still working to make it clear (?!?!?) that he is perfectly fit for his job!!!!!

And that's not enough! After hearing about lists of approved questions to radio hosts last July, it is reasonable to suspect that many more apologies should be made for pre-arranged interviews centered on topics, which had been previously authorized by the aides of the alleged Commander-in-chief.

There are no apologies, and there will never be any apologies, BUT the most pathetic and most intriguing part of the matter is that millions of people were still ready to vote for the incumbent Commander-in-chief despite the truth that was in front of their eyes. In practice, they were ready for another attack on democracy, because they couldn't seriously believe that their vote would contribute to the election of a real President of the United States at the end of a really democratic process.
Should their candidate have won the majority of the Electoral College, all the enthusiastic rallies with fervent supporters, each Democratic primary and the entire presidential election process would have simply played the role of a smoke screen to hide the real agenda.
The actual president would have necessarily been someone else or a sort of Hydra: a team made up of some bureaucrats (maybe nine, as many as the heads of the mythological monster!), who would have received no votesneither in the primaries, nor in the November elections!!!

Surely, the hypothetical presence of unelected puppeteers at the White House during the period 2025-2028 does not automatically mean that the destiny of the United States (and, to some degree, the destiny of the free world) would have been in the hands of incompetent, inept mandarins, BUT what we have been witnessing for about thirteen hundred days is not very encouraging:
➤ the devastating, almost destructive border policies, which have allowed millions of illegal immigrants to enter the United States, including a large number of potential terrorists
➤ the tragicomic saga of the pathetic pier along the Gaza Strip's coast in 2024
➤ the ridiculous "100 Days Masking Challenge" that was launched in January 2021 and was still in progress on April 13, 2022, when a US mandate required "travelers to wear masks on airplanes, trains and in transit hubs"
➤ the explosion of violent crime all around the countryand most of all in blue cities and blue states
➤ the recent, abysmal failure of the Secret Service at Donald Trump's rally in Pennsylvania
➤ the crazy plan to restore the Iran nuclear deal (an extravagant gift from the Obama administration!)
➤ the increase in the cost of living, especially in the gas prices
➤ the terribly low levels of education
➤ the botched, in a sense catastrophic, withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 or, if you prefer, the disastrous exit strategy, of which the Democratic presidential hopeful, "the last person in the room when Biden decided to move forward with plans that began under Trump to leave Afghanistan", is still extremely proud, since she recently dared to claim that "President Biden made the courageous and right decision [😨] to end America's longest war"AND she probably was so proud because some people can hardly understand that a smart person can work out a proper plan or make a right decision (e.g., by choosing to walk away from a burning building), while someone else can "move forward" in the worst possible way (e.g., by choosing to walk through a nearby petrol station, which suddenly catches fire and blows up)

What about foreign policy?!?!?
We have practically ended up with a steel alliance, which includes China, Iran, Russia and, possibly, North Korea, while Russia had been a potential NATO ally or, at least, a NATO friend, as proven by relations between NATO and the Russian Federation that date back to 1991.
Unfortunately, events that unfolded in Serbia (under the supervision of William J. Clinton), Libya (under the supervision of Barack H. Obama) and Syria (again under the supervision of Barack H. Obama) did not help very much.
Later, in 2014, while Barack H. Obama was still sitting in the Oval Office, there were early signs of climate change when Russia occupied Crimeaand no serious attempts were made to reach a fair compromise in the interest of both the Russian and Ukrainian ethnic groups in Donbass in 2021.
No diplomatic solution could be found... maybe in consequence of a D.C. - Zelensky - Burisma affair!!!

It goes without saying that such a hypothesis is/would be quickly (and easily) downplayed and dismissed as mean Russian propaganda or Russian disinformation by the mainstream media.
NONETHELESS, I wonder how the very same mainstream media would have reacted, if they had been offered the chance to embellish a made-up story about a Mar-a-Lago - Putin - Gazprom affair!!!!!

In actual fact, Russian propaganda, Russian disinformation and, more generally, Russian interference and meddling in Western politics and elections have always been depicted as a frightening threat by progressive gurus and politicians, who pretend that they never meddle in the politics and elections of foreign countries!!!
Or, perhaps, they simply pretend to ignore what they actually do!
Just to give an example, what about a "House Speaker Emerita", who claimed (April 2024) that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should have resigned?!?!?

In that case, was there no meddling?!? No interference?!?
Obviously, the mainstream media just gave the news WITHOUT any comments. They didn't repeat for days, weeks, months that someone was meddling in the politics of another country!!! They didn't react for days, weeks, months to a vicious interference in the affairs of another nation as they did, FOR INSTANCE, nearly four years before, when they mischievously made false claims about an alleged Russian propaganda campaign, because they needed to cover up a laptop problem!!!!!
Incidentally (and ironically!!!) it even happened that Netanyahu turned out to be the most suitable candidate for prime minister according to a poll which was released last August!!!!!

Now, four years later (four year after the scientifically orchestrated cover-up of the laptop accident), history repeats itself! The mainstream media stubbornly pretend that
➤ the alleged Commander-in-chief is fit for his job (maybe, even "very bold and vibrant"), although he is not fit to seek a second term!!!
➤ the vice-president (together with high-level party comrades) has never been a key element in the plot, in spite of several public statements which prove the oppositeand here follows a short, enlightening summary of interesting remarks:
♦ "We have a very bold and vibrant president in Joe Biden" (February 8, 2023)
♦ "He is an extraordinary leader and I wish that people could see what I see" (March 16, 2023)
♦ "He is extraordinarily smart. He has the ability to see around the corner" (January 16, 2024)
♦ "Our president is in good shape, in good health, and is ready to lead in our second term" (February 21, 2024)
➤ the vice-president has never been a (failed) "border czar", in the face of events that date back to April 2021 and were even reported by the (beyond any reasonable doubt) liberal Washington Postor, much more likely, she actually DID NOT FAIL AT ALL, but was the right bureaucrat in the right place to fulfill the woke agenda of the current US administration, as implied by the appointment of Alejandro Mayorkas as secretary of Homeland Security and, above all, as suggested by the choice of Tim Walz as running mate of the Democratic nominee: Tim Walz, the apparatchik who compared ICE raids to terrorism [town hall in Minnesota's second congressional district, 2017] and has been happy (and surely honored) to sign laws "that open state services and benefits to undocumented immigrants", instead of caring for US citizens

Furthermore, while the mainstream media are making any possible effort to claim that their idol has never been a "border czar", progressive networks systematically FORGET to remember that the illegal immigration policy which has been implemented for over three years is fully consistent with the vice president's strategic plans in 2019, when she was a presidential candidate. At that time, at a town hall in Iowa City, the beloved idol was asked if she would close immigration detention centers. The answer was very clear: "Absolutely, on day one. On day one."
Therefore, what happened later was NOT surprising, BUT emerged as a logical, inevitable consequence of the election result, even if she did not win the presidency on that occasion.

Interestingly enough, there seems to be no limit to shameless and blatant lies that can be invented by self-proclaimed democratic moguls for their political gains, as recently pointed out by a (beyond any reasonable doubt) progressive heavyweight:
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., on Sunday called Vice President Kamala Harris' decision to moderate her views on fracking and Medicare for All "pragmatic," saying that Harris is "doing what she thinks is right in order to win the election" and that he still considers her to be "progressive."
Needless to say, despite this accurate portrayal of the Democratic nominee and the clear-cut evidence of a presidential candidate who continues to operate in flip-flop mode, liberal networks and progressive news outlets are dead silent. All of them beware of telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth!
In the same way, they were silent and are still silent about the cognitive issues that have been plaguing their Commander-in-chiefWHILE we can easily guess what would have happened if Donald Trump had been the victim of a tragic debate on June 27, 2020!!!
In that case, there would have been an explosion of comments on a failed president, who should have immediately resigned, as well as there were explosions of comments when the mainstream media did their best to spread fake news (without a fact-checking process) because they felt the need to downplay a (real) laptop story or dismiss (palpable) government's pressure on tech platforms or insist on (nonexistent) Russian disinformation.

If we focus a bit more on the Democratic candidate's contribution to the Southern Border crisis, it must be acknowledged that the vice president's progressive agenda and, undoubtedly, the current illegal immigration policy are far from being isolated cases.
Indeed, the open borders project seems to be a top priority of a powerful politically correct (and wealthy!) US elite!
For instance, we have even seen nothing less than the draft of "a bill that could help undocumented immigrants in California buy homes".
So, there's no doubt that the politically correct (and wealthy!) US elite does not care a damn for American citizens "who really, really, really are having difficulty themselves" and "have followed all the rules in life" (as pointed out by Assemblymember Tom Lackey), but prefer to create a stronger electoral base for themselves and the future generations of politically correct bureaucrats!
Not for nothing does the politically correct (and wealthy!) US elite strongly oppose a bill "that would require documentary proof of US citizenship to register to vote in federal elections". As obvious as it sounds, "the bill is not expected to be taken up by the Democratic-controlled Senate and the Biden administration has said that it 'strongly opposes' the measure".
Clearly, these bureaucrats put their hopes in a rigged election process and bend over backwards to defend their stance. In the end, their public relations strategy seems to be based on the pretext that
❶ "it's illegal for people who aren't US citizens to vote in federal contests"
❷ "it rarely happens, given that violators face imprisonment and deportation"
HOWEVER, as mentioned even on the (beyond any reasonable doubt) liberal cnn website, "it rarely happens"—HAPPENS!!!... and, sadly, no mainstream media can be heard to cry foul!
They are in full agreement with the politically correct (and wealthy!) US elite and pretend to believe that the election process is going to be fair, ALTHOUGH IT DID REALLY HAPPEN!!!!!
Believe it or not, the US Department of Justice (as reported by some news networks) has come out with the news that "an illegal immigrant has reached an agreement to plead guilty to charges related to stealing a U.S. citizen's identity to vote in multiple elections and fraudulently obtain an American passport".
On top of that, there are reasons to believe that "state welfare agencies are giving illegal immigrants and other non-citizens a 'mechanism' to register to vote"!!!

Meanwhile, with regard to the "bill that could help undocumented immigrants in California buy homes", it has also been claimed that "it's the American Dream being available to more people".
YET, if we reflect on high criminality rate and homeless encampments (especially in states like California!), someone might stop thinking about any American Dream and start to believe in a sort of Venezuelan Dream...
Of course, the remark about the alleged "American Dream" was made well before the Governor of California decided to veto the billor, maybe, well before the Governor of California was essentially forced to veto the bill because of possible collateral political damage!

In all this mess, it seems really funny that the Biden-Harris administration is still making use of the ESTA program in order to enhance the "national security through the efficient and effective control [😅] of the cross-border flow of goods and people", while even terrorists are allowed to freely enter the United States through convenient corridors along the Southern Border!!!!!

In this post (and elsewhere in this blog), the fake news concept is assumed to be a fake problem, since any fake news can be easily exposedand we have a recent beautiful example!
On August 23, when Robert F. Kennedy Jr. erroneously claimed that "at the RNC convention, President Biden was mentioned only twice in four days" (instead of saying that Donald Trump, NOT all the speakers, had used the name "Biden" just twice!) it was quite easy to prove that the independent candidate had "made a wildly inaccurate claim"!
That said, it is worth noting that his detractors were quick to focus on the adverb twice, BUT did not delve into other issues, probably because it would have been hard to raise objections!!!
Here is a typical case of comments that seem to be hardly disputable:
"In the name of saving democracy, a Democratic Party set itself to dismantle it. Lacking confidence that its candidate could win a fair election at the voting booth, the DNC waged continual legal warfare against both President Trump and myself. Each time that our volunteers turned in those towering boxes of the signatures needed to get on the ballot the DNC dragged us into court, state after state, attempting to erase their work, and to subvert the will of the voters who had signed those petitions. It deployed DNC-aligned judges to throw me and other candidates off the ballot and to throw President Trump in jail. It ran a sham primary that was rigged to prevent any serious challenge to President Biden. Then, when a predictably awful debate performance precipitated a palace coup against President Biden, the same shadowy DNC operatives appointed his successor, also without an election. They installed a candidate who was so unpopular with voters that she dropped out in 2020 without winning a single delegate."

Well, let's go back to the flow of information, which is strictly managed and controlled according to the rules imposed by a politically correct philosophy. Hence, there's no hope that liberal political pundits will ever try to assess how much damage was caused by well-known riots in 2020, when
❶ the Minnesota governor had the brilliant idea of "waiting several days to call in the National Guard as Minneapolis burned"
❷ the now Democratic nominee apparently did her best to make people donate to a so-called "Minnesota Freedom Fund that bailed out criminals who then weeks later, committed murder"

Unfortunately, the propaganda machine is so effective that millions of voters are ready to support policies, which aim to promote crime, illegal immigration, terrorism AND MORE... MUCH MORE!!!
Most unfortunately, however, this is far from being an unexpected event, if we try to remember that even a huge number of American Jews are likely to vote for a candidate who
➤ claimed (December 2, 2023) that "too many innocent Palestinians have been killed", pretending to ignore that lots of terrorists were methodically embedded within groups of civilians in comfortable UNRWA structures, alleged residential areas, alleged schools and alleged hospitals... but according to the mainstream doctrine, there's nothing to worry about: it surely was with the noble aim of preserving the strength of the Palestinian terrorist organizations, always ready to take advantage of the never-too-much praised international laws, whose main purpose is to ensure that the civilized world can be easily blackmailed by unscrupulous criminals, whenever they choose to exploit civilians as cannon fodder and human shields
➤ gave a warning (March 24, 2024) about (maybe dire?!?) "consequences" and talked about a "huge mistake" (?!?), when Israel was likely to invade Rafah... but according to the mainstream doctrine, there's nothing to worry about: it surely was with the noble aim of allowing the Palestinian terrorist organizations to smuggle weapons through the Egyptian Border and continue to hit the Jewish State as hard as they could
➤ made a bold statement (August 9, 2024) to endorse a strategic solution whose final objective was the pull-out of the Israeli army from the Gaza Strip: "I have been clear: now is the time to get a ceasefire deal and get the hostage deal done"... but according to the mainstream doctrine, there's nothing to worry about: it surely was with the noble aim of allowing the Palestinian terrorist organizations to rebuild their tunnels, receive new weapons and get ready for another attack on Israel
➤ hired Nasrina Bargzie (August 2024), a former consultant "in Harris' White House office until July as a policy adviser on Muslim, Arab and Gaza-related issues"Nasrina Bargzie, who "caused the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) to close three investigations against three University of California schools, which alleged that Palestinian rights activism created an antisemitic climate" (2013) and proposed (2015) "the adoption of guidance that would acknowledge the potential chilling effect of federal government investigations, and clarify to recipients of federal funding that speech involving support for or opposition to a government's policies is a form of core political speech, not harassment"... but according to the mainstream doctrine, there's nothing to worry about: it surely was with the noble aim of making a significant contribution to the current worldwide wave of antisemitic violence (especially in US campuses), filled with complaints about alleged human rights abuses of Israel against the Palestinian people, without considering the legitimate right of the Jewish State to defend itself AFTER
♦ three wars that were launched against Israel (1948, 1967, 1973)
♦ eighteen years (from 1949 to 1967) during which the Palestinians and their Arab brothers got ready for a new war instead of working to establish a Palestinian State
♦ continuous terrorist activities that have been going on for over seventy-five years
♦ free elections (2006) in which the vast majority of the citizens of the Gaza Strip (including questionable innocent civilians) voted for a party, whose covenant gave unquestionable evidence of its true objective (the final solution): "The Hamas has been looking forward to implement Allah's promise whatever time it might take. The prophet, prayer and peace be upon him, said: The time will not come until Muslims will fight the Jews (and kill them); until the Jews hide behind rocks and trees, which will cry: O Muslim! there is a Jew hiding behind me, come on and kill him!"
➤ hired Ilan Goldenberg (August 2024), an outstanding example of utopian tactician and an enthusiastic supporter of the Iranian nuclear deal, who also opposed the Israeli settlements in the West Bank, blamed the move of the US embassy to Jerusalem, was a foreign policy adviser to Elizabeth Warren (the radical activist earnestly engaged in a full-time propaganda campaign against Israel) and has ties to the J Street group, an organization which was duly worried for the poor Palestinian terrorists and their weapon supplies, when the Israeli army was "readying for an offensive in the city of Rafah at the southern tip of Gaza"... but according to the mainstream doctrine, there's nothing to worry about: Isreal has no right to self- defense or, in the most benevolent scenario, should act with a proportional response, as the Americans did during the Vietnam Wara damn war (caused by the farsighted vision of John F. Kennedy), whose strategies, incidentally, were sheer madness for several reasons:
♦ the enemy showed no concern at all for the lives of its soldiers and, of course, for the lives of the South Vietnamese people, as proved, for instance, by the Tet Offensive, that killed tens of thousands of communist troops
♦ a large number of soldiers and civilians (on both sides) would have probably saved their lives, if the US had made a better use of its military power
♦ the outcome of the war might have been different by adopting a more aggressive approach... and this is a most critical issue, since the American defeat in Vietnam had no consequences for the survival of the United States, while the continuous aggressions against Israel could eventually lead to the end of the Jewish State, sooner or later

Meanwhile, a few weeks ago, in Chicago, lots of people enthusiastically welcomed a standing ovation for a lame duck, who claimed that pro-terrorist protesters "have a point", instead of thanking the Israelis, who had finally got rid of Fuad Shukr, a mastermind behind the bombing of the Beirut Marine Corps Barracks in 1983, when "241 Marines and other U.S. personnel, 58 French soldiers, and 6 civilians" were killed.
Neither has the mainstream media taken some time to insist on the heinous criminal activities of the terrorist organizations that operate in the Middle East or on the evil nature of the major sponsor of terrorism without borders, who gives no value to human life, as clearly shown by events that date back to the Iran-Iraq war, when young boys were exploited to clear minefields.

Well, let's come to the conclusion of this post with the above comments about the nature of the Iranian theocratic regime, which is persistently ignored and downplayed by the mainstream media, while it was thoroughly discussed in
Jihad Al-Kuffar, the fictitious diary of an al-Qaeda militant: a book, whose main purpose is to focus on terrorist threats.
Inevitably, as surely expected!, also the minefield episode was mentioned (in Chapter 14).
On this occasion, the scene takes place in August 2001 and the alleged writer of the diary is talking to an imaginary fellow fighter, who believes that Mullah Omar, in Afghanistan, is looking forward to recruiting Palestinian fighters:

"You know, Mullah Omar and his aides have pinned many hopes on Palestinians who have nothing to do all day long, thanks to the wise policy of their leaders. After fifty years, they keep waiting for a great prophecy to be fulfilledthe end of the State of Israel. A lot of them have already died while dreaming of that prophecy, and many more only live to die for a better future"
"maybe under nuclear bombs dropped by Iranian ayatollahs who are used to sending their children on minefields and have no reason at all to bother about a possible genocide of Palestinians if there's just a chance to get rid of Israel by exploiting weapons of mass destruction," I observed.




COMMENTS

Remark by SVH on 09/11/2024 at 11:20:32 AM
Subject: No hope
Content: There's no hope. If you're not a progressive politician, you must swim against the tide and make an extra effort to succeed in your everyday life, but something can easily go wrong.
Did you watch last night's debate? A great success for democracy: one person on one side, three people on the other!
In that arena, I couldn't believe that one of the three people was a FACT-CHECKER who ignored that babies actually died in the United States after failed abortions, probably because they were denied basic medical care: a practice that seems to be fully legitimate in some places, as clearly explained by Virginia Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam a few years ago.



Last updated on October 30, 2024